Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Omniscience | theasiankid | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Azorius Omniscience | flaviojr | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Azorius Omniscience | waffelsking | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Azorius Omniscience | prufrockjalfred | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Aggro , Azorius Omniscience , Azorius Tempo , Bant Tempo , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Proxy , Dimir Reanimator , Dimir Tempo , Esper Oculus
Meta Performance Analysis
Chart a Course ranks #174 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 43%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 71.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Chart a Course is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 19.01 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.7%. Chart a Course has a win rate of 73.1%, making it 0.8% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urabrask's Forge | Artifact | 23 | 69.0% | 8 |
| Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 10 | 67.1% | 1 |
| Scorching Dragonfire | Instant | 24 | 66.6% | 8 |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 30 | 63.5% | 8 |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 53 | 63.0% | 15 |
| Inti, Seneschal of the Sun | Legendary Creature — Human Knight | 47 | 62.5% | 15 |
| Fear of Missing Out | Enchantment Creature — Nightmare | 50 | 62.3% | 15 |
| Monument to Endurance | Artifact | 9 | 62.2% | 3 |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 41 | 62.1% | 11 |
| Abrade | Instant | 29 | 61.0% | 7 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Chart a Course than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 11 | 76.7% | 72.4% | +4.3% |
| Picklock Prankster | Creature — Faerie Rogue // Instant — Adventure | 2 | 5 | 80.0% | 76.6% | +3.4% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 24 | 75.3% | 73.2% | +2.1% |
| Riptide Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 5 | 17 | 74.4% | 72.8% | +1.6% |
| Haunt the Network | Sorcery | 5 | 10 | 73.7% | 73.1% | +0.6% |
| Johann's Stopgap | Sorcery | 4 | 10 | 73.1% | 72.8% | +0.3% |
| Grand Abolisher | Creature — Human Cleric | 2 | 20 | 74.1% | 73.9% | +0.2% |
| Fallaji Archaeologist | Creature — Human Scout | 2 | 21 | 73.7% | 73.7% | +0.0% |
| Oracle of Tragedy | Creature — Human Wizard | 2 | 16 | 74.0% | 74.4% | -0.4% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 21 | 73.7% | 74.3% | -0.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Tempo | 380 | 95.5% | 42.3% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 325 | 96.2% | 48.9% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 47 | 17.4% | 61.8% |
| Dimir Midrange | 19 | 0.9% | 32.0% |
| Unknown Archetype | 11 | 3.5% | 47.7% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.